Roger Ver is (snip) a useful idiot to said banksters (entirely possible).
After all, why would Roger be promoting alternative development plans that endanger the network?
After all, why would Roger be promoting alternative development plans that endanger the network?
+1
He seems like a nice guy, but a bit of a doofus, who got busted selling fireworks online. Last month he was whining about his unconfirmed bitcoin transaction that he created with no fee. Last year he was denied entry to the US after he renounced his citizenship to avoid taxes.
Well, I consider it equally possible that all of his "freedom" spiel is simply his cover as an agent of the bankster establishment, fairly deep cover of course. If anyone thinks that's far fetched, bear in mind the lengths that espionage agents will undergo to establish convincing credentials for a given operation. Take a look into the history of espionage if you're unaware.
But of course, it's impossible to tell whether Roger Ver is a useful idiot or an anti-Bitcoin agent, definitive evidence either way doesn't exist (and in the case of the "useful idiot" scenario, not necessarily mutually exclusive
). One thing about Ver that is positively true though: the Bitcoin Judas moniker