hungerstyle - In their thread, Directbet states (I'm numbering the claims, the rest I've copied and pasted):


1) "You will notice the transaction was double spent in the exact same manner he planned to double spend his bet in case it loses.

He deliberately sent it as a big sized transaction with significantly low fees at first, and later double spent it in a transaction with excessive fees, much higher fees than required to ensure the double spend is executed immediately on the next block."




2) "If you look at his posts you will see that for several days he tried to avoid posting the payout address of his bet, because he knew this would be an evidence of his fraudulent activity, and not just towards DirectBet."




3) "When we first confronted him with our findings he did not deny his double spend attempt. Moreover, he agreed not to do it again if we return his original wager. However, when we asked him to sign a formal agreement he refused."



4) "Later on he informed us that he is not the person who sent this bet transfer and that he does not own the payout address used for this bet."



5) "When we asked to get in touch with the person who actually sent this bet transfer and who owns the payout address, he said that this person is "not available". "



I assume Directbet has evidence of all of these claims using emails and pm's in your mutual correspondence.
If so, it seems clear that they have a solid case against you.

Under each numbered quote, can you state what you disagree with if anything, and post any proof of your disagreements if you have any.