Sure it is all fine and dandy to make various idle threats to withdraw poole mining power - but it is a very risky move to actually attempt some kind of politically divisive action, and then potentially lose mining power when miners move to other pools because they don't want to support such unnecessary and wreckless attempts at blackmailing (that even under decent scenarios seems likely to fail)
Free help:
The word is spelled pool. Four letters. P-O-O-L. This about the 5th time I've seen this asshattery from you. Stop it.
That actually sounds exactly like something he would do. Shake your hand with a sly self-righteous smile and then spit in your face when it came time to deliver on the agreed terms.
Delivering 2 proposals would be going above and beyond and giving the community 2 extra HF choices instead of one. This would be fulfilling his end of the agreement and going above and beyond. Having many implementations is a good thing right? More choices and all.
I'm all for it, and the people (who have invested millions of $ into securing the network) he shook hands with will love it too. However, I would prefer the keccak fork to be 1MB4EVA, or maybe 0.5 MB to cut down on spam miners are currently using to bloat my hdd and stutter my netflix.