Amazing, and I thought my English needs improvement. Don't even get me started on how you imply every other sentence.
So you consider sending someone hardware and they having to do software code and general support for who knows how long? A year? as free
I've no fucking idea what part of New York you live in and what people there think, but I do wonder what things you require that you consider people should do for you that you consider worth nothing.
Here you imply:
- 1. Assuming I, who did not sent you a unit thinks open source support is free,
- 2. Assumed more by providing support you justify for hardware, thus should receive one.
- 3. drag New York into this for no fucking reason, is the bold parts even English? That I'm not sure, but yet again, another assumption.
I also will note that you got Xiangfu to do the driver software development but did NOT give him an Avalon.
I wonder if he got ripped off with what you paid him for that ...
An Avalon is only $1300 retail ...
Here's what you imply:
1. Assuming I did not give Xiangfu a unit, every Avalon developer is entitled to a special unit with gold-plated PCB and signed unit, but we've been so busy we didn't even celebrate our chip success yet, which is now more than a month ago.
I wonder if he got ripped off with what you paid him for that ...
2.
What the fuck are you trying to imply here scum? For your information, xiangfu named his own price.
3. Why is the price of the unit a factor here?
Though I will point out for others, that you did NOT get the cgminer source for free.
It came with the GPL license requirements.
When did I mention I got this for free? more imply please.
When did I violate GPL license requirement? Oh wait, as you said, I did not.
But if you are going to come into my thread a year ago stating on how every other ASIC manufacture has been given developers free units so they may support their hardware and if I and Avalon choose not to do this you will not provide support then I'll reject you on sheer principle fucking level.
Good day.
Good for you - that's your principle.
Though I'd like to see the quote you are implying ... ... ... ...
Here you go:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=120184.msg1317892#msg1317892Let's say I was wrong and you didn't say
"If you want support then you must provide me hardware."
because you
assumed I was going to ask you to provide support.
THEN what's the problem you have with Avalon that "piss you off" aside from the fact we are slow to provide source code, but is still within the definition of GPLv3?