It is about you failing to respond to any of my technical points and wanting to just ignore the reality.
You don't want to have substantive debate with an expert.
Seems you are offended by something.
No i don't want to have a debate, i had a question.
"My question is how can bitcoin sensible avoid these two scenarios?"
THis was your only "decent" response to my question
"There is only one possible way you defeat those bastards. And that is to make something so popular, that can't be centralized. Once it is very popular, they will have a difficult time taking it away from the people."
which as I have already discussed is illogical. The more popular BTC becomes the more centralized it will become. Why would "The People" host a node if all it does is cost them money? The People wont save BTC from centralization. If they could have they would have already and we wouldn't be looking at this geographic collection of power in China. So yea you offended me by ignoring logic and posting B.S in this thread...