That piece on Desert Snow is pretty interesting, just finished reading it... It's odd that a system like Black Asphalt runs freely online.
Not only that but they give out awards to their students and LEO will use these awards on their resumes.
https://www.desertsnow.com/pages/view/6Now most of the stuff they have to do and seize to get the award could be argued as "a good thing" but this requirement:
*QUALIFIED INCIDENTS / SEIZURES:
US Currency Successful forfeiture of more than $5,000
is a little bit shady.
As for the phone, let's imagine that the phone is seized and you manage to get the funds there moved after the phone being seized, is it valid in the eyes of the law comparing the transaction timestamp on the blockchain to the time when the seize occurred?
As for giving them the password or the moved funds... Shouldn't it be "and" instead of "or"? Because you can give them the password after the funds have already been swept.
Yes, they will look at the time of the move relative to the seizure.
They (Homeland Security) are not as bright as they are made out to be on TV but not quite as stupid as you might want them to be.