Just because I did not respond to your tangent of baloney does not mean that I do not understand your various attempts at stretching logic into incredulity.

You know what, if you were genuinely attempting to engage in material and relevant points and addressing those kinds of more central matters, then maybe it would be acceptable, from time to time, to explore some of your baloney, abstract and minutely relevant puzzles of a point.  

It does not do a whole hell of a lot of good to talk about various abstractions, when there is plenty of concrete and more relevant points (that you conveniently like to ignore with your broad generalized nonsense).