Barry Silbert says:
Although Silbert is excited about Ethereum, he does not agree with the vision held by some of Ethereums most-ardent supporters. He explained:
I sense theres a certain utopian view of society, which I may or may not agree with philosophically, that I just dont see from a real-world application perspective happening anytime soon.
Silbert went on to explain that a world where there is no regulation, lawyers, contracts, or SEC rules is not going to exist in the near future. He then clarified, It may solve some problems. The idea of a decentralized autonomous organization, its super interesting.
Silbert also noted that many of the earliest applications built on Ethereum are related to gambling, Ponzi schemes, or pyramid schemes, but he also admitted that this isnt necessarily a problem. He added, Thats OK because thats an interesting way to experiment; its certainly what happened with Bitcoin.
What Does the World Need from Ethereum?
One of the main criticisms of Ethereum up to this point has been the lack of useful applications that solve real-world problems. On a recent episode of Unconfirmed Transactions, host Dan Anderson and Wall Street veteran Tone Vays described how Ethereum supporters were unable to provide any use cases for the project to them at a recent meetup in New York.
During his panel appearance on day one of Consensus 2016, Silbert seemed sympathetic to the idea that practical applications of Ethereum are yet to be found. He stated: I dont think the world needs a decentralized Uber, which is one project. I dont think the world needs a decentralized AirBnb, which is another project.
Having said that, its important to remember that Ethereum is a platform on which a developer is essentially given the power to build any decentralized application they wish. Its possible the best use cases of Ethereum have simply not been thought of at this point.
During his final comments on DAOs, Silbert questioned the role these decentralized organizations can play in the real world. He concluded:
These DAOs that are raising money from the masses with basically its a blank check. Its a pool of capital thats going to be deployed in a way that I think will be very democratic. Im skeptical because I dont know the role it needs to play in society. I dont know, in the capital formation process, whats wrong with our current system that its solving for. Im philosophically supportive. I hope its successful, but I dont see the problem its solving yet.