What I disliked JJG is the attacking and it would reach flaming also.
Me and you have different points of view, but we like and respect each others as friends and brothers.
But to start attacking you and dismiss your right in thanking or giving credit for what you've done, this is not acceptable at all by me and you.
I believe that none of us are really beyond attacking, either when we are being attacked or when we are recognized the posting of repeated nonsense. I certainly am not beyond attacking folks, especially when it seems warranted.
I recall when you and I first started interacting, you asserted that you were about ready to put me on ignore because you felt that I was attacking Stolfi too much, and in essence, I explained to you that my perception of Stolfi was based on a series of his apparent passive aggressive posts in which he was continuing to spread disinformation and to selectively spin facts, which was very misleading, even though he was nice about it, he deserved to be attacked from time to time... and maybe even ferociously...?? hahahahahaha
I am pretty tolerant of debate and disagreement and even some bullshit arguments when there are attempts to back them up with either logic, facts or both... but I do sometimes begin to lose my cool when attempting to engage with someone and they continue to just spout out talking points and it seems to be more of an effort at misleading, rather than an attempt at genuinely pointing out some kind of bitcoin weakness.