Ninjastic
PostEdited versionsQuotes to this post
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: Game over Ethereum
by
iamnotback
on 19/06/2016, 14:29:07 UTC
Quote from: toknormal on June 19, 2016, 12:03:27 PM
It isn't "tarnished forever" if the problem is confined to where it originated. That was the whole point of a "Turing Complete" scripting language - to isolate one contract from another and from the underlying platform itself as I've explained here and in previous posts in that thread.

I responded to your linked post as quoted above:

Quote from: iamnotback on June 19, 2016, 02:26:49 PM
Quote from: toknormal on June 19, 2016, 11:26:55 AM
The very architecture of a smart contract blockchain makes the logic of the "Turing Complete" scripting language independent of the logic of the blockchain on which it runs. Kind of like the separation of executive a legislative powers in states. If you decide to p*ss all over that principle just to save yourself embarrassment and investors in a known risky asset from taking a haircut then you just kill it for everybody.

Incorrect! Turing-completeness is unbounded recursion. Thus it makes it impossible to encapsulate scripts from each other and from internal recursion, etc.. It is the opposite of your incorrect assumption!

You should stop spreading lies about computer science that you do not understand.