The problem with a lot of critics is they don't understand republics. Republics are messy. It's been that way since the ancient Roman republic. Republics have a bunch of decision-makers responding to different interests. That's messy.
The above quote regards this messyness as "distortions." Distortions from what? Distortions from how an utopian society would be if one genius were in charge of defining a free market? Do we need someone to decide the proper amount of florists and sales clerks, and the appropriate set of skills for society? No thanks.
A free market is whatever a republic decides it is, even it's messy.
It's hard to respond to the above. I characterized today's world as being distorted by elite manipulation of markets that pushed the economy on a path totally different from the free-market path.
You argue that the truly free-market path is politically impossible -- I can respect that (though I have different thoughts about it.) On the other hand, you imply that I want the state to control the economy even worse than it is controlled today. I want no such thing. Plus, this seems to contradict your own other point.
I can't respond properly to an improperly formulated set of arguments.