Any attack on a crypto turns back the time real investors would pile in.
Nope. More publicity just like Mt. Gox. The clusterfuck dies and the well designed code grows stronger.
Sorry if you feel victimized, but maybe you should blame your God Butalik. You can stay in the camp with Jim Jones or you can get out while you still have a chance at $12.
That'll be the MtGox that battered BTC price down to a couple of hundred dollars. Now wonder where BTC would be had MtGox not happened. Any attack on crypto, hurts crypto. End of.
And we are back at $750.
Btw, I expect BTC to rise to $1200, while ETH falls to $1 or even $0.25. The "attacker's" latest offer will soon start to take over the mining of Ethereum. Or Vitalik will call for an emergency fork, which will destroy the sanctity of Ethereum forever (and probably fail because new miners can popup with a majority of the hashrate funded by the "attacker's" offer in order to reject the fork). Either way, they are fucked now because Vitalik pushed for a vote on a fork (destroying the Nash equilibrium), which is forcing the "attacker" to drain the rest of the DAO into miner's pockets.
Guess you were too busy following the forums and call the people names. Bitcoin was dumped to $712 on BTC-e and it is now $733 on average with continuing declining...
That is just volatility at the cup handle before the blast off to $1200.
See r0ach's chart linked in the quote of him below:
I tried to find the posts where r0ach was stalking me in other threads and gloating about Bitcoin being up to $600, but appears he (or the mods) wisely deleted those posts containing his snide/flippant remarks. Damn, I should have quoted them for posterity.
Any way, I found this plagiarism and notice the dates of the two posts...
The thing I've always hated about your insistence on trying to push this Armstrong character is that you basically imply we live in a deterministic universe...
Any way, I found this plagiarism and notice the dates of the two posts...
It is possible that Bitcoin has U bottomed at $150 and will meander up to $1200 over the next several months.
The thing I've always hated about your insistence on trying to push this Armstrong character is that you basically imply we live in a deterministic universe...
Bitcoin has now completed a giant, two year long cup and handle...
That is just volatility at the cup handle before the blast off to $1200.
You mean we will not see BTC for $150? All this time I've been holding fiat to buy BTC for $150 as you predicted. And gold for $800.
It is not a meritocracy when you pretend to have not read what I know you read before in r0ach's thread:
Obviously Bitcoin is only in a deadcat bounce or in a long-winded, gradually rising U bottom, not on the verge of some immediately imminent vertical rocket upwards past the prior $1200 peak.
It is possible that Bitcoin has U bottomed at $150 and will meander up to $1200 over the next several months.
A rocket shot to $3000+ is not in the cards this year.
If we do meander up to $1200, a flag 33 - 67% decline pattern is likely before advancing further.
I do hope for the U bottom scenario, because it means much more liquidity for altcoin moonshots, than the alternative crash scenario.
The $850 gold prediction is from Martin Armstrong, and he says it is still in force.
I had written so many times over the past year or more, that I was tying BTC to gold but that was not certain because MA did not make that link. I said it was possible that my assumption of BTC and gold being linked as private assets might be incorrect. I had always stated that. If you need quotes as proof, you are welcome to ask me for them. But you are wasting my time.
I trusted you and MA. Give me my $150 BTC and $800 gold, you promised these prices
I never promised anything. I provided caveats as I pointed out in my prior post. You are just trying to attack my reputation. That is clear for all readers to see. Stop wasting our time on nonsense.
Sorry this is not the Alcoholics Anonymous forum.
Your reputation is a troll. MA too. Anyone who makes their trades based on you two's "predictions" will lose money. It's clear for all readers to see that.
Okay I understand your feelings are hurt. Thanks for sharing.
Nonsense. I didn't follow your trade advice, because I have common sense and see a troll from a mile away. I wasn't sure about BTC not going to $150 primarily because it's in the few hands of the Chinese who can destroy it any time, but I was 100% sure gold couldn't get to $800, that's why I saw your and MA's "predictions" as bullshit from the start. But I feel sorry for n00bs who could have fallen into the trap. There were no caveats, it was a matter of fact prediction, same as rising rates were predicted as a matter of fact. None of that came true. Troll you are. N00bs beware.
I never provided "advice". I have numerous disclaimers stating I only share my opinion and this is not be construed as advice. I am not an advisor. Nearly every sane individual on BCT knows that people here are not giving advice and are not professional advisors. This is not Alcoholics Anonymous. Grow up and be responsible for yourself and stop whining. Nobody forced you to read my posts.
Just like my prediction for silver in 2010 for rise from $22 to $45 and back down to $26 for Spring 2011, which was exactly correct.
Just like my calls for temporary top of ETH at $6, the first major top at $15, then predicting the fall to $7 and bounce to a double-top at $15. And the final call @ ~$18-20 for an attack that would crash the price. All of which was correct. There are quotes available to dig up to prove this.
There are numerous other successful predictions as well, but I am lazy to type any more replies to your silly waste of time.