So 2 wrongs make a right?
Nope. You all had a chance to only get a 30% haircut, but you were determined to vote, thus commit 2 wrongs and break Nash equilibrium and lose 100%:
Stoopid.
What are you taking about 30% haircut?
In the attacker's original interview, he stated he stopped draining the DAO at 30% drained, as an olive branch of sorts. But this depends of course of you not stealing his rightfully gained tokens with your
attempted insecure 51% attack hard fork.
Since you've all voted to steal his tokens, he is forced to drain the rest of your tokens and redistribute them to a new set of miners who will replace your existing miners.
You guys passed up the best chance you had to not lose it all.
I do not understand why the Ethereum Foundation does not drain the DAO to a child DAO? That could save something.