...
The tail reward is much lower than the current reward.
So then if smooth already admitted that a 100X hashrate might be difficult to source but feasible, so then 1000X becomes feasible when Monero's hashrate drops by 1/10 as you admit.
Please stop the lies! You continue to lie (see bolded, underlined).
So after wasting my entire fucking day, I was correct.
And you wonder why people get annoyed at Monero's community. Surely you are smart enough to have figured this all out 3 pages back and said, "you are correct". Then I would respect you.
Everyone knows that software developers disrespect those people who waste our time. Because we never have enough time.
r0ach close the damn thread. It is wasting a lot of precious time!
So:
1) Wait for Monero to reach tail emission
2) Hope the price does not go up in the interim (A major failure that is orthogonal to this debate)
3) And then the attack is barely feasible.
Edit 1: Maybe we should table this debate until Monero reaches the tail emission, since the attack has to wait until then to have even a hope of possible feasibility, and save everyone a lot of time.
Edit 2: r0ach did not start this thread.