Your config looks to be fine. But importantly: you are CPU mining, against some (small'ish?) ASIC competition.
Your chances of quickly finding a block are not looking great

Edit: wtf wtf, I just turned legendary, I'm
breaking out !!!

Yeah, I understand that. The problem is not with the amount of shares I am getting or the amount of blocks I am finding. The error specifically says that the payout address has not been defined. So, of course, I am immediately closing it. My conf and miner have the same username and password defined. So that should be fine.
Congrats on legendary.
If your configuration file already enables server, you don't need to set that also via shortcut.
Otherwise you look to be all set...
Thanks. Good to know.
So it appears I am all set but mining is still not working.
I'm operating under the assumption that "rpcuser" is my receiving address and that "rpcpassword" is whatever I want or some variables/options if applicable. I have created the .conf in my roaming folder that has everything exactly the same as what was provided except for the "rpcuser" being changed to my receiving address. When I start the miner (Pooler's cpuminer 2.4.5) it says
http://prntscr.com/bji0l7 which suggests I'm not getting paid out. I tried with the other one that brother3 recommended and I got a JSON error I don't know what to do with.
I've mined a few dozen different coins on multiple different algorithms. I'm no expert but I'm pretty confident that if I'm having this much difficulty many others are too.
I could be wrong but i believe rpcuser and rpcpassword are the user name and password that you use in the miner. for instance rpcuser = "joe" rpcpassword = "password" at least thats what i did and mine is working great.
Correct, it is whatever you set them in the "breakout.conf" file.
-tb-
Thanks. So, maybe that's where I am running into this issue. Where do I define the payout address? If the rpcuser can be "joe" then how does it know where to send the coins?
You don't have to define the payout address while mining. Block reward will get sent to your default SIS, BRK and BRX addresses.
-tb-
This is how i got mining working for me.
breakout.conf:
rpcuser=user
rpcpassword=x
daemon=1
server=1
debug=0
defaultcurrency=BRK
defaultstake=BRX
testnet=0
and on cgminer i run:
cgminer -a sha256d -o 127.0.0.1:50542 -u user -p x
or the guiminer works too guiminer.org
hope this helps you out.
you dont need to use a wellet address because 1 ur connecting to ur wallet(server) so when block goes ding! it auto gets added to your wallet =)
Thanks. Some helpful information there.
I changed my .conf to exactly the same as yours and changed my .bat to exactly the same as yours is and still nothing with a dozen different versions of minerd. cgminer seems to think I have nothing to mine with. guiminer package from their website is incomplete for some reason. So the cpuminer doesn't even exist. The folder it's supposed to be in doesn't come in the package. I checked some other versions of guiminer that I have and wasn't able to get anything working with that either.
I guess I'll just give up. I have no idea why I can't mine SIS but I can mine pretty much any other coin, but here we are. Thank you for your effort.
Maybe the devs will decide to change their OP to include some information about mining instead of just "coming soon". Or maybe they just want to keep the mining to as few people as possible. Who knows.
I have tried this game , it looks cool . but unfortunately the bookie is really hard to beat. I got three of kind queens(Q) lost with three of kind three (3).

That might have been Bittrex-Richie. He's nearly unbeatable!
So what do you think about this game? Is it fair play or not? no matter how good my cards he definitely nicer . and only once did I just win

I've come 1st in 2 tournaments and 3rd in 2. I've had many good hands and even more bad ones. I'm pretty confident that the game was fair to me.
The biggest annoyance and the reason I stopped playing the game is because of all of the people who literally do nothing but fold. Especially the ones that are quite obviously playing on multiple accounts. Folding over and over on all but one until they're knocked out then suddenly one of the other ones stops folding. Yeah, such a coincidence... Maybe now that there are more people playing it will be more fun, but the chance at 500 BRK wasn't worth the time to watch people fold over and over. It was painful. Extremely boring. One of the least fun games I have ever played.
I don't know if that's a normal thing in poker. People folding for 20 hands in a row. I never played poker before trying out Breakout because I don't care for card games. I found it fun when people actually played, but if it's a standard for people to just fold endlessly then I'm not interested.
There are quite a lot of people who register to the tournament and then aren't able to play the tournament for whatever reason, so they are sitting out. Also keep in mind that it's very common and good strategy to play tight in a 10 seat tournament folding 20 hands in a row isn't that uncommon. I agree that it's sometimes quite boring to watch people fold around in no limit holdem tournaments, that's why I suggested earlier to have Pot limit omaha tournaments added to the schedule, PLO has way more action and is imo much more fun game than No limit holdem.