You entirely didn't understand the issue, because the quoted is irrelevant to the issue I pointed out.

PWNED again.

This confirms that everyone in Monero is a clueless idiot, since none of them have yet admitted that what I pointed out in my prior post, totally REKTED Monero and all other proof-of-work altcoins. Actually the author of dao attack is the one who pointed this issue out, but I also remember being aware of this issue in the past. It is one of the reasons I invented unprofitable proof-of-work.

Smooth your damage-control-lies are not what I expected from you. What ever you do to adjust the algorithm to compensate in one way, will open a vulnerability in another way. It is absolutely insoluble for to defend against even a 10X attack, not to mention a 100X attack. Arguing that any significant number of miners will indefinitely mine at 0 income is disingenuous. The difference between the 51% attack and the 10X burst attack is not that the total hashrate expended by the attacker is less, but that it is 10X less income for the other miners.

Note I don't enjoy having to say this against smooth. I respect smooth, but this is out-of-character for him.