The HK agreement between miners and blockstream (basically Core) represents consensus. It clearly says both 2 MB hardfork and Segwit to be delivered. Doing one but not the other one is actually stalling - not to mention breaking intentionally agreement is quick way to loose all credibility - not best day for Bitcoin if it really happens considering blockstream basically represents Core, the most used Bitcoin full node implementation today.
Wrong. The HK agreement was between the miners and the people who were representing themselves that they. It doesn't "clearly say" that you claim that it does. The people who had signed that agreement, "vouched" to deliver a HF proposal and code 3 months after Segwit release (there's still some time left). However, they can not force other Core members to agree or accept that proposal in any way. Blockstream does not represent Core. That is a bullshit statement.The blockstream core devs are introducing additional features into Bitcoin that are increasingly complex, and have plans for additional features that are substantially more complex.
If these features are too complex for your comprehension skills, do not generalize the statement for others. Let's all blame Core for adding very useful features and all the soft forks that were deployed so far, shall we? 
You heard it here first Jihan.
The HK agreement was a farce, and you were the mark.
The HK agreement was a farce, and you were the mark.
Maxwell has already voiced his disagreement with the agreement so this should be known by now. He's not the only one though (e.g. maaku).
thread is full of trolls spouting nonsense claims about the HK agreement and Segwit, all CircleTM-jerking to back up each others trollish claims. Don't feed the trolls.
I was expecting them to ruin the wonderful news.