Even if the IDs are provided, I'm not going to track you down, and hire a lawyer to sue you, so I get my funds back. It's just not worth the time, money and effort, which is why most defaulters get away. There is this guy with over 70BTC+ defaulted total, and his pictures/id are online. He hasn't been sued yet. Also, your remark about how free speech might affect your funding is pretty low. Do politicians have the right to jail people that speak against them, so they will get into office again? Nope. There isn't a lot people can do once you default. Also, why are you using gmail? You would think a company that cares about encryption and security wouldn't use a service that can easily see all your emails, without letting you know. You have a domain.
I use gmail for my personal stuff. For our business we use our own private email server. Like I have explained in my previous post.
I think you are mistaken.. I was talking about the fake accustation being posted. Accusing a company of being a scam or fake when they quite clearly are a legit company trading is not free speech it is a form of slander.
n. oral deformation, in which someone tells one or more persons an untruth about another,
which untruth will harm the reputation of the person or company defamed. Slander is a civil wrong (tort) and can be the basis for a lawsuit.
Having a opinion about a service is one thing.. Posting on a listing that its a fake company is slander..
To be honest I am not here to fight or get into a massive heated debate about what people think about me or my company.
I have asked BTC jam to confirm the position on defaults as I was unaware there is little recourse for people who are left with nothing after a investment and if that is the case its very low of btcjam not to have something in place to sort this out.. Please see e-mail correspondence.
While I understand now there is some serious issues with people trusting BTC jam I see no reason for a personal attack or just bashing me just for a response.
Further to this Vod posted something that I issued a reply to then he removed it.. Fair? i think not..
Like I said.. i am happy to speak with anyone be it email or on the phone about investment and rest assured we are fully verified and have a growing company that could be held liable if anything was to go wrong.
While we were looking to keep in the bitcoin community and build some trust up and use BTC jam instead of the "horrible" highstreet bank. after seeing the reaction here I think next time we will stick to the high street bank where we don't need to try defend out standing and they can "verify" us without having to post everything about ourselves in the public domain.
We have posted our domain also.. I think you have skipped thru this topic and posted the same questions that have already been answered.
Thanks again..
Scottish Security