Re: ★★DigiByte|极特币★★[DGB]✔DigiByte Gaming

you are right. i suspect jared and his "team" bluffing people around dgb to help his self to have more btc... the coin never grow... lot of sells day for little buy. links in the website don't work since long time. nothing new except like you say " this year is a good year for dgb" or we are in discussion with 20 banks ... links in the website doesnt work like digistats and digiexplorer... cannot see the hashrate of the coin... and only fake buy wall that never buy... it seem a manipulate coin...

Yes, it's hard to understand isn't it. Look at Myriad, the original multi-algo coin. Its stats page and block explorer have always worked, wallets all work, links on the website all work. If you check the 'myriadteam' github you can see the development is very active, multiple community members volunteer their time to keep the coin up to date and add new features.

Now look at DigiByte. They're using the exact same 3 year old version of bitcoin core that Myriad used when it launched. A month ago they claimed to be working on 0.12.0, but a quick look at their github shows all they've done is forked it without making any commits.

I agree, I think this coin is manipulated. It's probably mostly the instamine that gets shuffled around on the orderbooks every day.

Sorry, but it looks like the only thing Myriad has to show for it is a guy named after it doing some fudding in other coins threads. You are really giving Myriad a bad name with stuff like that. Then all these posts about code base version? Pointing out that DGB code isn't developing as nicely as it should be would be fair enough. But you are sounding as staying an up-to-date copy of Bitcoin with an added little twist is all people should be looking for in a coin. I don't want to say that a coin shouldn't incorporate the good bits added into Bitcoins, or other coins, code into its own but I couldn't care less what version of code base it is, given it is developed following its chosen path. Sadly the coding part indeed looks like to be the weak link in DGBs setup but I hope the Digibyte team works to improve their ability to be able to deliver according to the promises and maintain everything to keep it reliably going. DigiByte has a lot of potential after all.

I wonder why myriadcoin user is always present here in this thread?

Are you emotionally affected because Digibyte cloned the multi-algo idea? (are you hurt because even until today Digibyte is being traded for "at least" 50 satoshi?(which is a bad thing for coins starting to age, but/and a good thing for a coin with a lot of supply!?!))

Altcoin competition is tough! If jared and his "team" are just bluffing, that's bad and sad! ..But we already bought Jared's promises, we can't just accept potential loses. We should stick together and think of something that might be able to solve our problems(which is "being caught on Jared's promises").

Hes basically annoyed because he likes myriad coin a lot. He's a hypocrite going on about digibytes changes yet myriad coin used bitcoin as a base so both are forks regardless... its not how many lines are changed but what the product does. But its ok for myriad coin to build off bitcoin but not digibyte to build off myriadcoin work.

It would be ok though if myriadcoin was worth more than digibyte and his investment through the roof. Thats basically what it comes down to. Just ignore him/her. Its pointless and comes down to a battle they are trying to fight that nobody cares about. Even the myriad coin community thinks that person is loony and doing them a disjustice.

If myriadcoins invested heavily in dgb from the start he/she would be digibytes biggest shill and likely posting the same rot in myriadcoins thread.