Hi quicksilver!
First of all, if I was in need of some kind of "security" services, if they cannot even get my name right, then I would not listen to any kind of proposal that they have for me.
And thanks for pointing that out but Ill stick with my legal team's view on the situation over someone "expressing" there view on the subject.
Legal advice cost nothing
For some reason I doubt that you have a team of lawyers working for free (insert lawyer joke here).
I have made it clear that we require to buy some new comms equipment and further storage for our company.
Yes you did, however you did not make clear
why you need this equipment, with supporting documentation. And no, showing your equipment running at capacity is not going to backup that you need this equipment. If I claimed to be in the business of selling widgets, and was attempting to get a loan from the bank in order to buy a second warehouse, then the bank will not ask to see a picture of a nearly full warehouse, the bank will want to see sales figures that demonstrate the need for a second warehouse as well as documentation that my online and/or physical presence (eg my store) reasonably would support those sales figures.
You will see have applied for BTC4.9867 = 2,374 GBP (as of 10.54AM 26.06.16)
--snip--
So we should be left with just around the £2000 GBP mark.. Not $4000 USD as posted by VOD..
You would be left with roughly $3,300 as of when Vod posted his $4,000 figure, although his figure is technically off by a little, bit the difference is not really meaningful, and the point still remains.
I posted out SC company number that can be checked
I am fairly certain that this is useless.
You say he has give me numerous opportunities to legitimize the loan? Do you care to point these out to me?
What is your hosting URL so we can verify you do your own hosting?
We do not host websites..
OK... provide the operational IP of your backend so we can verify your story.
I won't be posting any IP address
There are no question that he has put to me that I have not given a indepth answer to..
I disagree