no one has yet shown that these ideals are plausible
....
Any project I launch will be attempting to achieve these goals.
Well, well... Anonymint is still living in fantasy land, but at least he can admit it now.
Here he is spewing some false ideal ideology that no one can hope to achieve.
Meanwhile, tearing down other people's genuine effort/experiments/innovations, because they are flawed based on the unrealistic ideologies he concocted.
A wise man once said "those that can't do teach", and it is easy to see that applies here.
In the OP you admit that no one has been able to solve the ideals you claim as being ideal.
Then, you go on to crucify any cryptocurrency that doesn't meet these unobtainable ideals by trolling Bitcointalk.
Since no one is willing to waste as much time as you are by defending their points, you "win" by default.
Exhibit B...Since your ideal list of cryptocurrency "must haves" is not achievable, it is akin to me saying "all cryptocurrencies should solve world hunger" or "all cryptocurrencies should have the ability to time travel".
Then, imagine that I go around trolling all cryptocurrencies that do not have these features.
That is in essence what you have been doing for the past year(s) on here.
Exhibit C...There is no such thing as a fair cryptocurrency distribution.
What is fair to someone (for example, you) would not be considered fair by someone else (enter some random person here).
You may think you have obtained some state of enlightenment, and been able to solve the problem no one has been able to solve, but you are fooling yourself.
I cannot wait for you to release your plans for an "ideal" distribution so that I can point out all of the ways it will be considered unfair by random current and future participants.