QA can brag all that he wants about his past performance, but it is likely to be merely words than supported by actual facts, and even if he has actual facts of good performance (such as 14%) in the past, unlikely he would be able to repeat consistently future equivalent levels of performance.. and then to expect other regular people to achieve such levels of performance on a consistent basis is fantasyland logic.
Coming from you that means absolutely nothing.
Yeah, in comparison, as if you have any kind of credibility (beyond in your own head) in making stupid-ass and pretentious assertions to emphatically state that regular people can safely and consistently earn 10% to 20% in their investments....
O.k.... I will bite. What is it that I have said or done that undermines my credibility?