So, let me rephrase that:
You don't know what Bitcoin is, how it works, or what it's good for, but came up with an idea that is somehow better?
How can you even decide that your idea is better, if you haven't understood the idea behind Bitcoin yet?
The whole point behind Bitcoin is, that it doesn't need a central authority.
You didn't even get that.
You have to do a lot of research.
That's right I don't know much about bitcoins expect to what i read in a few pages, I know it doesn't need a central authority. But based of what I did read which is that one person has 250000 coins which is 1 percent of the total wealth, and others also have too much, I can still say that a fair system is one that nobody starts with more than the other. I don't see any moral justification in which the first comer get the most, and I'm sure other better ideas can be thought to fix that.
It's also true I don't understand the reason bitcoins production is decided to work this way.
Nope. The system is based around the idea of an economy built on exchanges of bitcoin for goods and services. Provide or good or service, and you can get some bitcoin.
(Mining is just a footnote.)
This idea happens in all economies. I'm not talking about how the bitcoins exchanged later, I'm talking about the problem in creating bitcoins this way.
Also, the value of the currency will change over time. So if each new registrant gets only 1 equalcoin, early adopters may get a coin that is worth 1/10000th of a pizza, while later adopters will get a coin that may be worth 10000 pizzas! That's not fair, and not equally distributed.
It's fair enough because he could keep the bitcoins and get the 10000 pizzas, it's up to him if he decides to spend it earlier or not But I don't think the value will be higher, the value should be constant if each person that starts to participate in the trade gets his coin.