I just dont understand why people want to do a hardfork, when the risks associated with it are just too big.
They are either dishonest or dont understand what they are talking about:
They are either dishonest or dont understand what they are talking about:
...if you debate against op's opinion you are a stupid and/or lying?
(ps, "But I hope troll posts or low intellect posts (usually 1 liners) will be removed by forum moderators." - ^ see above post ^)
Oh do tell us about your high-brow adult arguments about how the txdata blocksize should start doubling til Bitcoin reaches oblivion. I think people can decide whether I'm being fiercely defensive of my BTC assets and the code protecting them, or, what was it you said? Oh, "low intellect one-liners" appears to be your magic bullet criticism lol.
The "Adult" tactics of the BigBlockers include:
- Constant straw-man derailing of irrefutable points
- Using misleading or bizarre brand names/marketing expressions for technologies that either contradict the evoked psychology ("Classic"), or don't work as advertised ("xthin")
- "Weirdo" character accounts, where the (assumed) personality/beliefs/avatar/sig etc are designed to mock or malign Bitcoin supporters
- Fabricated statistical graphics, designed to suggest the existence of events that have never taken place
- Constant lying and fabrications about Bitcoin supporters to suggest they have conflicts of interest
- Constant lying and fabrications about Bitcoin developers to suggest they have conflicts of interest
- Abusing the forum trust system to malign Bitcoin supporters
- Claiming that the entire blocksize debate was started by the Bitcoin supporters
I could go on. But you're the real grown ups, right? Yeah, the grown-ups that use every nasty little trick in the book to get your own way. Die you fucking scumbags