Re: Chinese Miners Revolt, Announces Plan to Hard Fork to Classic
Just a friendly reminder of who's really in charge:
bitcoinocracy.com/arguments/if-non-core-hard-fork-wins-major-holders-will-sell-btc-driving-price-into-the-ground
Or a reminder of who's "all talk" as they say.bitcoinocracy.com/arguments/if-non-core-hard-fork-wins-major-holders-will-sell-btc-driving-price-into-the-ground
There is nothing wrong with having a different opinion.
While you do say that, I don't think that the others feel the same way. I've been under the impression (by multiple members) that if one sides with Core that they're either a Blockstream employee or biased in some other way (i.e. there is no *normal reason* for them to have such a stance).There is also nothing wrong with not having an open mind, which I don't think you have.
Well, there you are very much wrong. I've shifted my positions several times since the initial 20 MB proposal by Gavin. I've learned several things in the meantime, and do not see a decent reason for going toward the 2 MB block size limit. Until someone provides it (them), there's no reason to support that proposal (no, "segwit is complex" and similar nonsense are not reasons for 2 MB block size limit).Please refrain from the immature ad-hominem attacks (that are not even true). They only damage your credibility 
Sorry, it's not "immature" nor ad-hominem since it is true. Bogus escrow. Besides, I'm not the one who initiated person discussions (albeit they're off topic?).