Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Chinese Miners Revolt, Announces Plan to Hard Fork to Classic
by
Quickseller
on 01/07/2016, 07:21:31 UTC
Anyone posting a link to this website is automatically deducted 10 credibility points.

http://archive.is/tF2NJ

18mkjbVaHAcMauL6iiy7zm9VjMYCjy4UU1 and 1K5PrGXqH8iSpKX4YsPp5gStLLsYTmnVBh are two of the three largest voters in this "poll" containing 5000.00010000 and 4400.00123500BTC respectively.

18mkjbVaHAcMauL6iiy7zm9VjMYCjy4UU1 is part of wallet [2270e827e3] which sent 4,400BTC to wallet [f25f84f160], and the only address in this wallet is 1K5PrGXqH8iSpKX4YsPp5gStLLsYTmnVBh

Also, 1Mjye4SM5W4PX6tGD3div6PS48vKf1nVzS is the 5th largest address "voting" a certain way which is part of wallet [d0b06ef0f9], which received a single transaction of 1999.9995BTC from [2270e827e3] (above).

Moving down the list, 1MHHdX1KN32tC7KGqHQGn1XWjPmwjRc4Yu is part of wallet [ba63ab3713], which received a single transaction, being from [e1418c6ff3] in the amount of 540.8989BTC. This wallet received a transaction in the amount of 599.9995BTC from [2270e827e3] (above)

In other words, three of the top five (and 4 of the top 7) addresses "voting" a certain way can be easily linked together as being likely controlled by the same person. These 4 addresses make up ~52% of the bitcoin that a voting a certain way. If more then half of the bitcoin in that poll is voting a certain way, but attempting to make it appear that multiple people are voting in harmony, but in reality is really only one person voting, then there is nothing to say that other significantly large addresses in that poll are not also controlled by that same person.