as to carlton and his blockstream devotion(a corporation funded using bank money) is the "group" that has the echo chamber of circle jerking to the already converted corporate lovers
ToominCoin aka "Bitcoin_Classic" #R3KTthe real funny thing is blockstreamers cannot pretend they want decentralized independence if they call shill to who is not TEAM blockstream.. which brings me to an earlier point
as for what i have done for the community lol.. well carlton didnt answer my question about if you would do a "REKT" campaign on luke JR when he releases his "independent code" that is not blockstream/core accepted.. so you can just presume what you like about my potential answer too.
the answer is 2 possibilities
1. indeed Luke Jr would receive the noble REKT campaign because it defies blockstream investors contract, and breaches one of the conditions that would release one of the financial tranches.. so ofcourse there has to be a big push to destroy its chances of success
2. carlton will have to backtrack every statement he made and accept luke Jr's code.
EG its a "marmite" decision. you either love it or hate it..
What if the blocksize limit were chosen by each node individually?
Everyone would set the minimum = send and the maximum =receive.
So for example I would send minimum 2 mb blocks (if full), but accept maximum 6 mb blocks.
Would it work? That would make it optional for those with shitty internet to put a cap, but those that have good internet would have bigger cap (but not infinite to defend against DDOS)