the issues with this debate is simple
the github says " Amendments to the Bitcoin paper"
which in itself sounds like a bad title and provoking
also cobra is known to follow in theymos and other blockstream fanboys rhetoric. and has been very vocal that he is on the side of blockstream
so although fanboys like lauda, theymos and cobra are not blockstream or core devs. alot of people call them blockstreamers due to their cultist behavior
here is a prime example when flipping the debate so that blockstreamers see it from their point of view
its much like gmaxwell, lauda calling ANYONE that wants an increase in the blocksize, a "classic"..
How classic.

I know it's "Classic" (and /r/btc) style to
....
Only time will tell, but I guess that would be consistent with their "Classic" naming practice, enh?
yet 99% of people gmaxwell and lauda and everyone else who terms others as "classics" are not actually classic devs.. yet they use that term themselves to pander their own narrative..
but with that being said.
KEEP the original, dont amend or edit or add notes to the original
instead
make something new and found via a different link.. that references the original but using more updated terms, techniques and descriptions