Re: Chinese Miners Revolt, Announces Plan to Hard Fork to Classic
Hes also cunning enough to wait several months before vociferously denouncing it, calling the participants, including the president of his company, well-meaning dipshits.
I'm glad that people are allowed to have their own (subjective) opinions.Please explain the danger of header first mining, for the network, not for the miners that could potentially mine a block that nodes consider invalid.
Without going into any detail (I'm certain that you could find information yourself and that there are better qualified people to explain it): https://twitter.com/NickSzabo4/status/673544762754895872blocks mined in the last 24 hours were in BIP-9 (old version without SW)
whereas typically half of the blocks mined were BIP 68 112 113 (new versions including SW)
No. CSV has been activated and Segwit activation parameters have not been set up and the Core version containing Segwit has not been released (no idea what you mean by "including SW). whereas typically half of the blocks mined were BIP 68 112 113 (new versions including SW)
Anyone can visit Coin.Dance and see Classic is holding steady at about 11% of total nodes.
"Steady".