Very interesting indeed:
It's an interesting idea. In Dash, it has the obvious problem that Dash was instamined for millions of coins in a matter of hours after release, so those devs and extremely early adopters will be able to have more of a vote than others and for cheaper. But there's a more fundamental and philosophical problem with it to me. With a stake holder vote, your governance becomes a plutocracy (where rich people have all the say in decision making).
Do we think it's a good thing that rich people should have a bigger vote than poor people in governance?
Same applies here. I have no doubt it's the Devs who control many of the voting coins. But even if not, it's very few "rich" people controlling the vote right now. Voting to screw over the majority (anyone still mining) to benefit the few large coin holders is precisely the reason why it's a bad idea.