My last pm to you over 24 hours ago got no response so here we are
AFAIK we don't have a 24 hour deadline for PMs yet lol.
Understood. It would be only natural, according to what you're saying, that the service in question received those ratings first IMO. So mind telling my for what reason am I singled out here, out of so many members (there's at least 1 DT member wearing their signature) and Betcoin itself? After a certain amount of time and accounts it becomes obvious to one.
Frankly speaking,I don't think it makes much sense to apply special signature rules to Staff as well.As said,there are more than 30 members carrying the signature of betcoin.ag who should be equally responsible for promoting the casino.No special actions needs to be taken just because you're a "Staff".
I'm not and I haven't done anything wrong either. What you're saying would only be fair in case that every single participant receives that negative rating.
Correct.Otherwise,makes it look like a personal attack.
Lauda responded by posting a BS disclaimer
Another personal attack against Lauda. I don't know if it's because Lauda represents the establishment that has labelled QS a scammer, or he just hates Lauda because Lauda is honest.
This is
not a personal attack against Lauda - May be BetSoft or Betcoin.ag could call that.. I can see both sides. OP thinks that being a staff, Lauda should not promote this particular site.