Yes, they could be audited.
And perhaps the auditor could prove they were doing something unethical.
But it would be impossible to prove the site did not cheat. If it were possible to prove, we would have ourselves a provably fair raffle.
Personally, I think the only thing they are likely guilty of is allowing players to abuse their promotions. They have immediate motivation to stop someone from entering each raffle 20 times, if anything they want to avoid any complaints about non-payment.
The players following the rules would be the only ones suffering.
Instead of focusing on Mar and mar, you should be hunting for alts and checking them against the data imo
Kinda like this:...
You are right. Deposit money to a gambling site mainly depends on trust and not control. But why would anyone trust Timothy John Heath while he already embezzled player deposits?
Are you confident that they do not use player deposits for business expenses/promotions? If so, based on what?
Do you believe that they pay everything from their own pocket and have a profitable business model, while their promotions are too good to be true?
Does this make sense?