You are right. Deposit money to a gambling site mainly depend on trust and not control. But why would anyone trust Timothy John Heath while he already embezzled player deposits?
Are you confident that they do not use player deposits for business expenses/promotions? If so, based on what?
Do you believe that they pay everything from their own pocket and have a profitable business model, while their promotions are too good to be true?
Does this make sense?
My point is that making accusations against a site after a raffl like this one is pointless.
If the're guilty they can easily prevent players from finding out. If they are innocent, it's literally impossible for them to prove so.
It's ironic everyone seems to have overlooked the users like xinzark who (imo) were almost certainly guilty. You guy do realize, when someone enters more than once, and it's against the rules, you are the ones being cheated...right? It's no different than the owner putting in fake accounts\ as far as how it affects you.
So far the only legitimate complaints I can think of involving Sportsbet.io and their raffle have yet to be made.
Focusing on something that you can not prove is a waste of time. Add in the fact its basically a free giveaway (5mbtc/ day right?)
They could prove that they have the money for their too good to be true promotions and business expenses, so this is definetely a legitimate complaint.
A legitimate raffle-show does not help much if one day bettors will not get their money back!