and here's the contains of PM with Lauda:
http://i.imgur.com/luOXJ8l.pngand here, the proof he well know the problem about VOD feedback before his recent bad feedback ..
as we have talking about before the genesis #1 "issue"...
so he have used this to trying discredit me ...
http://i.imgur.com/QWrA64c.pngPosting private chat logs is not cool. There are other ways to deal with issues.
I don't see any indication that the messages posted were GPG encrypted so I don't see any reason why anyone would expect those messages to stay private. There should not be any expectation that a Personal message/direct message be kept private if they are not encrypted, especially if there is no explicit request to maintain confidentiality (a privnote sent in plaintext might be an exception to this, however it is still possible that someone will intercept this).
@Lauda- are the screenshots of those messages an accurate representation of what you said to defcon23 at one point? If not then what is inaccurate?
I don't think that cryptodevil is an alt of neotux, and making this claim will only be a distraction.
I like how quickseller thinks that people PGP encrypt PMs on IRC

If you're having a private discussion with someone and you then later publish that discussion then it's certainly an aggressive act. It's also not clear that these screenshots aren't simply faked. Anyone can use any username on IRC and it's really not hard to do a little image editing anyway. In any case, it's not clear to me what defcon is accusing him of. If the screenshots are real then it looks like Lauda wanted to buy some item or another and was feeling impatient, then it looks like he refused to get involved in a personal dispute between Vod and defcon. what's the accusation here?