and yes.... that's not cool ....but just not more than what Lauda have done in this case...
And what was that exactly? He was impatient about buying something from you? He refused to get involved in some dispute between you and Vod? I don't understand.
dispute between me and vod was one year ago... recently i have ask to Lauda if he could hep to solve it , waht he refused.
untli that no problem.
That seems well within his prerogative and not shady at all. I wouldn't want to get involved in disputes that don't involve me.
the rest is more interesting: i have bought a coin , which he want: i have refused to trade it at his conditions ( 25$) so, he first menace to left a bad feedback,
I sorta thought that part was a joke.
then he left me a bad ranking , using this old story between me and vod .. ( power abuse , extortion , blackmail... call it as you want.., in anyway : BAD
Well, if it is the case that he at first refused to intervene, and the dispute was over 1 year old, then he later intervened with a negative directly after you refused to trade with him, that seems like poor judgment. I don't know what Lauda will say, but in the end, trust isn't moderated and we've long had known scammers on default trust. I assume this is your issue, that Lauda is somewhere in the default trust network and that his feedback is damaging your rep.