Re: Proof-of-stake can never scale without blowing up, because PoS isn't trustless
Here is the problem, I don't believe your explanation.
Please stop trolling the thread with blue text. We can read your B&W text just fine.
Your stated reasons for disbelief are already refuted in the OP.
You are politically trolling the thread. You are not at all interested in learning nor having a factual debate. Until you raise your level of comprehension, we can't even debate each other, because you don't even comprehend what I am writing.
I could say the same of you, always referencing your other writings as scripture instead of having a direct conversation,
pretending your smarter than everyone else gets old and too aloof to explain yourself.
You seem incapable of even attempting to grasp that your theories could be wrong and refused a direct debate per theory, claiming others do not understand.
Longest chain with the most difficulty Wins in PoS or PoW is not rocket science ,
Checkpoints are PoS or PoW , also not rocket science.
Nothing You have written , gives me any reason to see your OP as factual.
I find your theories lacking and your refusal to direct examination , as an obfuscation of truth seeking, merely your own pretense to hype your own upcoming coin.
Which you will claim as neither PoS or PoW, and superior to all, but be forewarned don't expect anyone to believe it because you post some contrived version of Logic, which turns out to be invalid.
IMO, this trust-less nonsense is no different than the permission-less nonsense that you and others have tried to pass off as concrete evidence in the past.
I do agree , we are both wasting our time, since your mind is closed and you claim mine to be.
So good luck with your coin.
And we will let Time decide the validity of our Choices.
ZEIT's Proof of Stake vs (Whatever you name yours)
