Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: Proof-of-stake can never scale without blowing up, because PoS isn't trustless
by
iamnotback
on 14/07/2016, 04:38:38 UTC
Ok generalizethis, I give you green light to handle him by quoting from your excuses that shitcoin liars use to avoid a debate.

He is now instead of addressing the technical points, using the "then attack our PoS coin to prove it" tactic of avoiding the technical point, when in fact I quoted the Vericoin white paper in the OP where they admitted that 30% of the tokens were stoken by an exchange because PoS has the technical problems I have enumerated.

And his claim that PoS doesn't need checkpoints is making him the laughing stock of any one who knows anything about this issue. Even Vitalik admits that and he is pro-PoS. I have cited in the OP a research paper from BitFury which explains that in great detail. He is just a troll.

There is absolutely nothing to say to someone who so incredibly disingenuous. How can anyone have a rational discussion with someone who doesn't even understand nor address the technical points. And pretends that Vericoin's theft never happened. And pretends that even Vitalik and every one doesn't admits PoS requires checkpoints to deal with the Long Range attack problem.

He will go on a tirade now, because he has made an complete fool of himself for all readers to see. Nothing more for me to say to him.