I've contacted him in an attempt to make peace, he continues by writing a long wall of text and posts a screenshot here before I could even read it (not to mention reply to it).
-snip-
Is it time to rename the thread to "People from defcon's trust list praising defcon"? I don't see how this is relevant to me, the thread sidetracked anyways. That text is suited for a reputation thread. In the meantime (since the thread was created by neotox) he has left 3 retaliatory feedback (called Vod a scammer, called cryptodevil an alt of neotox and called neotox a "total scammer"), all of which are unjustified.
I've had no issue either. All good here.
I've had a trade with him as well, however that doesn't justify his past actions.
Lauda, how old are you?
Old enough to treat everyone equally, and old enough not to let people extort me into removing ratings (I was told to remove my rating in order to bid on the auction).
I feel like the timing of the accusation is biased due to other activities surrounding this event.
Even if I had left it 1 month from now, it would have been "due to not selling genesis on his terms" so I figured I might as well do it right now (which is 10 days after any discussions of a potential sale). The reasoning "You can't leave a negative rating if we had a strong argument" is nonsense. Keep in mind that my feedback is focused on the retaliatory unjustified feedback by him (one is 4 months old, and the latest one is 1 day old), not the fact that he used to run a bogus escrow scam. Quote:"and is thus untrustworthy regardless of the initial accusation."
hum;... i'm surprised i dont see any mentions on the untrustworthy feedbacks left against me :
2: by the troll forum sheriff ( vod) 1 year ago too..
3: by the troll who comes in this discussion yesterday in shouting " burn the witch !!! " lol
and by the way: if what you said is true , dear super moderator: why have you leave your feedback only yesterday ? as the "story" was one year old ?? RE LOL