If the 3000 signups per day claim is correct, then they are seeing at least 60% abandoned accounts rate, which also is approximately corroborated by the loss of actives of newbies from all history to recent 7 days.
Only 28% of the weeks active are active on any given day. So the majority are not revisiting every day. Given the evidence of a high rate of attrition, it is possible that instead of gaining a set of sticky users which is 40% of the signups, instead what might be happening is after so many days, nearly 100% abandon the site and the new signups are replacing the lost people (
mathematically plausible if the rate of signups has been increasing which would also mean the attrition rate is much higher than 60% when comparing recent 7 days to all history). Meaning that it is possible the site has no stickiness. We need see charts on users by age of account and activity in order to answer this question. Also to more accurately see how the rates might be changing over time.
The last 24 hours stats might be skewed by the downtime due to the hack.
You have responded to everything I said, but you have been wrong. Your posts have been riddled with factual inaccuracies and wild speculation based on false assumptions (or more likely, outright lies).
I think you are a liar in the sense of trying to paint the prior posts without repeating all the details again. I will let the reader read all my posts and decide. You are trying to respin what was already written, which is a trolling tactic.
The readers are free to read all your posts and my posts and decide if you were wrong.
You are free to reargue the details of our prior posts. Go ahead if you want, and I will reiterate my prior points in rebuttal.
Readers please note I've put chryspano on Ignore. So I won't be replying to him. I find that he doesn't make any point. If anyone feels he has made a valid point that needs to be rebutted, you may inform me.