Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: IDEAL: no ICOs, no proof-of-work, no proof-of-stake, no governance, and no forks
by
iamnotback
on 16/07/2016, 20:37:56 UTC
No pow - i dont think it is possible.

Who wrote "no PoW"? Did you read the OP:

2.No (Satoshi) Proof-of-work: Proof-of-work concentrates the money supply, economic profits, and control to the mining farms (esp. those with electricity subsidies). Meet your new central bank masters, the mining cartel. Permissionless, trustless attributes are lost, e.g. forks are possible. Since all the debasement ends up with the rich via mining, the system has no countervailing mechanism to recirculate the money supply to prevent it from losing its attribute as a unit-of-exchange for the broad public. Proof-of-work launches provide no funding for the core developers, unless they are accomplished with premine, instamine, stealthmine, or non-optimized proof-of-work function deceptions.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1524286.msg15342314#msg15342314

And the thread:

I'm a proof of work guy.

Me also. Note the OP says "No (Satoshi) Proof-of-work". I've invented a new system of proof-of-work which I claim doesn't have the flaws of Nakamoto proof-of-work:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1319681.msg15137236#msg15137236
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1520678.msg15340104#msg15340104
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1524286.msg15352029#msg15352029