Re: Q: Should Lauda *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no
@Lauda: My intentions when reporting some of the posts defcon made in the past were not to resparkle the conflict of yours (neither was it my intention to start one myself, for what it's worth), I'm sorry should this now be the result, I didn't expect them to react in a way like this.
I understand that. Who would have expected someone to get upset over a few posts. Sometimes, even my own old posts get deleted. It's not something to stress about unless you were damaged in the process (e.g. highly constructive posts). Unless there is a bigger conspiracy at hand that the mods don't want us to know about. 
You mean this (from the chat) "lauda= hilaroius= cyrus= malevolent"? 
the reports ( abusives) are made by Lutpin , wich work with Lauda beind the scene , against me .
Again, I have nothing to do with this. I've found about it when you messaged me on IRC regarding the matter.So this is irrelevant to the extortion?
One day I'm not an extortionist, the next day I am. I guess it changes with the weather. 
You do understand that Lauda did not delete your posts, as that is impossible, right?
That is correct. Even if I had something to do with this (which I honestly don't) another (more experienced) moderator would have to agree to delete it.it's because Lada have try to extortion for this coin , he have menace to rate me in red on my ranking if i dont sold him this coin for 25$ as i pretty well know i would sold it for 0.25 bitcoins !
So now we can see in the future and determine what the price of a coin is going to be? Anyhow, I'm the one who bought it through mj for 0.25BTC.