If there IS a solution to the problem then it is absolutely NOT addressed by debating how someone with 51%+ should spread their mining - that's solving an entirely different issue (how to pretend that a centralised system is decentralised by giving temporary control to other people and fantasising that noone notices the transfer of control is revocable).
Exactly. That's why we've been talking about [a plan to] physically (location) and logically (authority) split power [to be put in place if it comes to that].
I don't know how you got the opposite impression but I've been saying exactly what you're saying and more for months.