Kanati,
Regarding enforcemyarbitration we advise you not to work with them, they are using our user database without authorization (they got it from NET-ARB from when we used their service) and working with net-arb to enforce the loans, this is a violation of arbitration laws (the arbitror cannot work with the lawyer that is enforcing the award).
I'm verifying with Dhami what this authentication means. They are a separate arbitration firm and we are not allowed to interfere with the process since the loans are made inside our platform (arbitration needs come from an uninvolved third party).
Best,
Tulkas is talking out of his a** again. I have researched this. There is no connection between enforcemyarbitration and net-arb. However net-arb "cooperates" with enforcemyarbitration to validate awards while btcjam, tulkas, and the invisible mr. dhami all turn a blind eye to trying to help us get our money back. There is nothing illegal about net-arb's cooperation - in fact, it would be illegal for a legitimate arbitration firm not to cooperate.
Face facts - btcjam does not want to help you because it hurts their bottom line.