That was to show that I was directly involved in a game that included an admitted multi-accounter who was rightfully banned, in reference to the validity of my claim that I was affected personally. Multiple accounts on poker sites should not be allowed because it affects the integrity of the game.
I don't understand why you have to resort to ad-hominem attacks against Twitchy to reinforce your crumbling arguments for still supporting Twitchy. The source doesn't matter if there's evidence there, which
there is. The past entire page was just all about Twitchy's
credibility which is completely irrelevant. Multiple accounts and all that garbage is what you've been stuck on, and what of it? How does that refute the evidence against Betcoin?
Betcoin's entire history of ignorance and pushing away discussion relating to anything negative about them should definitely set off some alarms.