Re: [ANN] [TRUMP] [MODERATED] TrumpCoin SuperPAC

Siege, Are you really a Trump supporter? Not trying to be smart, but I think I saw something somewhere that stated you oppose us because you support Trump and don't want to see his name associated with what you perceive to be a scam.

Is this accurate?

Correct!

Trump has no association with Trumpcoin

There's absolute no way Trumpcoin was made for Trump's campaign

I know it. It's going to be used by the close people within the group to split the coins and dump when Trumpcoin is at its highest

It happened before...nearly

And I know it'll happen again. There is no trust

Whether it's bitbobb, DreadLord, chicken

I mentioned giving the trumpfunds to an outsider who is actually close to Donald Trump but it seems like I was ignored there in the past

That was me offering my solution to maybe just maybe turn this around. But the way it is now I'm 100% sure this coin is going down

I respect this about you.

1. I have already publicly registered an LLC to my own identity, which is now publicly available on my SCC filing.
2. We are preparing filings now for the FEC which will make my ID even more public along with Dread's.
3. We really are starting a SuperPAC to campaign for Donald Trump legally and transparently.
4. We plan to leverage our PAC to push for better FEC acceptance of crypto.

What part of any of this is a scam? Why would I attach my identity to a scam like that?

Ok in that case maybe I never paid too much attention to the part you actually made your ID public, so it does help with the credibility of yourself

With the 4 points you mention I agree and now see you are loyal to the project. Sorry for any accusations before my bad

But what about the trumpfunds, I know DreadLord is in control but wouldn't it have been better for people close to Trump to hold and tell it's specifically for the campaign?

"But what about the trumpfunds, I know DreadLord is in control but wouldn't it have been better for people close to Trump to hold and tell it's specifically for the campaign?"

We've discussed this for awhile in previous threads. We agreed upon voting a trusted member with set rules in place held for accountability and safety of the coin.

I believe you care about the project Siege and I think there was a bit of misunderstanding throughout all of this. Signal has done a tremendous amount of work making the coin established and has actively listened to the community. He even mentioned that he had no problem in stepping down if that was what the community voted for.

This is a community oriented project and while your voice is respected it's important to understand that the community is ultimately the deciding factor as we've agreed that a democracy set in place would be the best option for the coin.

Thank you for voicing your concerns, I'm sure there are people viewing this thread that had similar questions as you have had and it's important we answer them without resorting to long spacious posts with bold and large text that make progress harder to achieve