This still doesn't prove (what RB tries to claim) that the concept of free market is atomic, that it can't be further reduced to distinct interactions of individuals (with all their whimsies and fancies) by way of deduction, on the one hand, or that it can't be arranged from the same interactions by way of induction, on the other...
As I've said, free market is a particular form of individual economic interactions taken integrally, as a whole
What can and cant be sold is determined by society (or more like the government to be specific).
In a free market scenario where the government would not be involved, the rules would still apply. Most people have morality ,not because of some laws that politicians issue, but because they have conscience.
That aside,
the market is just an organized way for humans to interact and pass value around.
But just a page ago you were claiming that free market exists separately and independently from people (to justify that it was not free market's fault that people harmed themselves). How come that you changed your mind?
Lol, you are talking about free market as something existing separately and in isolation from all those people, when, in fact, it is no more than a handy generalization of the way people transact between themselves...
Either directly or through intermediaries like companies and corporations
Because it does