This is bad for the participants and to those who want to join in the near future. If that's the case are you going to put negative trust to fortune jack signature campaign participants also? Because they have an inconsistent and not trusted image? You should tag them also I think, since your reason for this is that the casino being advertised have some anomalies.
FortuneJack also relies on their signature campaign to build and maintain their reputation. Good point.
I also suspect many users have alt accounts in both Betcoin and FJ.
That's for another thread though, I don't want to derail.
Are people starting to fully understand what is going on in regards to 2 of our 3 negative trusts that remain own or are deeply involved in direct online competitive casinos and at least two of the other negative trust reviews are owned by the same person...
Wow, it's really pretty slimy to smear others to get our of your mess. I assume you're talking about Dooglus and his ownership of just-dice, but we both know his trust feedback to you has absolutely nothing to him being a competitor, but rather his concern for players. He runs an old-school toycoin casino, that doesn't even take bitcoin or offer anything but dice. It's hard to call that a "direct competitor", and we know both know very well that your business has
absolutely zero impact on his.
Honestly I think you owe him an apology for this, and your other insinuating remarks.
The fact dooglus has waited this long has me puzzled after
they lied to him,
treated him like shit and eventually just
ignored him