but since the frozen coin is lost anyway it is "easier" to invest than really taking NEW coins into this kamikaze project that might never be able to earn back all the debts that were accumulated by the old admin.
But if you have different proposal you can contact the
admin@bitmarket.euI think in his mail there were some alternatives presented when i am correct
I don't agree and I think your view is the complete opposite of mine. Nothing is "easier" with our situation. We don't have the luxury to just forget about it and spend our coins elsewhere. Our coins are trapped between a rock and a hard place, and we have a few poor options to choose between, one of which is to form a partnership with the man who embezzled our money in the first place. I thought the point of this whole operation was to make amends and pay back what is owed. Not to offer the crappiest deal any of the victims would still be willing to accept, while avoiding going to prison. I could be offered pennies to a dollar, and technically that would still be more than nothing at all, but at that point I wouldn't be willing to cooperate any more.
If the decision stands that new coins will have more than twice the buying power of frozen coins, then I will be choosing to collect 30% of my coins and leave this whole mess behind me, (provided the offer still stands.) Then, at least I can choose whether I want to spend my coins on an investment in this company or black tar heroin.