Re: ❃❃ ▶▷ BETCOIN.ag ◁◀ ❃❃#Signature Campaign-High Pay, Monthly Bonus, Special Award
However, the questions as to Betsoft's integrity will be answered by a respected audit conducted by qualified teams.
If you think the shady offshore "licensing" farms are going to do any sort of audit, you are very very wrong.
What is wrong with the impartial 9 month audit that was already done? https://www.casinolistings.com/news/2016/06/warning-avoid-all-betsoft-slots-and-casino-games
...you know, the one that led to every major online sportsbook/casino to remove Betsoft games from their site?
Are you saying that casinolistings audited the Betsoft software? Or, are you mistaking an interpretation of a 9 month limited scope statistical analysis for a software audit? Are you also saying that all these casinos stopped providing Betsoft software: http://www.askgamblers.com/software/betsoft/ ?
Anyway, sorry....I'm done here. i don't feel like I'm getting anywhere.
I'm saying that their audit will be FAR more comprehensive than anything that is done by the sovern nation that Betsoft pays a monthly fee to for a "license".
Also, for someone who seems to feel so strongly about multi-accounters being evil, you sure do seem to have a LOT of WPN accounts
Yes...those are all single accounts at separate casinos....and it is well within the terms and conditions. That is not multi-accounting. I might add that they do not allow multiple skins on the network to be open from a single location. You should know that yourself. A multiple-account is more than one account opened at a single casino....thus the word "multiple" otherwise the word used would have been "single." Furthermore, I was grandfathered into the WPN from casinos that the WPN absorbed from different networks. Blackchip poker was a merge casino....if you remember right....the same goes for many of the other WPN skins absorbed from different networks, such as BetDSI, Truepoker, PokerHost.....etc.
As for the licensing: My point is that they ARE licensed and there are avenues for remediation. I see that there are many casinos on this forum that cannot provide gaming licenses and do not provide a means for remediation whatsoever which peer review is the only option. Should we also call out those casinos for operating without a license or operating in jurisdictions without meeting regulatory standards? Is it acceptable to endorse unlicensed, non-regulated casinos that operate outside of jurisdiction in one's signature?
So, what are we talking about here? Are we talking about where we can report unlicensed and unregulated gaming operations, or are we talking about giving somebody negative trust for running a scam? And, are we talking about giving signature campaigners negative trust for promoting competitive products that they believe in, or are we talking about who does and does not have the authority to make those decisions?