if apps ever start deciding to do this and it affects MoneyPot's volume we will simply change our T&C ...
Ok thank you. I'm a little surprised that Betterbets at least has not done this yet. I think if MP and certain app/casinos really grow and profits accumulate, some of the larger apps/casinos will take a look at bankrolling some of their own action. First world problems I guess ...
The current bankroll of moneypot is very large and it is enough to support highroller if they feel like wanting to go big from the start of the game. Betterbets are giving away around 80% of their profit from volume to the rubies stakeholder monthly, regardless if there casino is losing or making money so if they are switching to their own bankroll then it is not possible for them to do this again
Ps Im not sure if it is 80% or all of it though
thanks for another sig posting
Moneypot's BR is very large but never large enough = the larger the better
are you saying that a casino like BB giving away 80% of their profit should not have their own BR?
no need for you to answer because I know the answer already and I saw your sig
an answer from BB would be acceptable because they know better
You are as stupid as you used to be , thankyou for the laugh anyway. You should take a look at their previous offer for 40 spots of rubies stakeholder in exchange for their profit . If they are using their own bankroll, they will not be getting anything from volume so they cant guarantee monthly profit for their stakeholders. As of now, they are down by 42 btc, by using your stupid logic they wont be able to give some monthly profit for their stakeholder if they are using their own bankroll which means they are not getting anything from volume generated for moneypot